Feb 19, 2025
Stanford Just Proved Carbon Capture Is a Waste?
A Stanford University study finds that investing in renewable energy is far more efficient and cost-effective at reducing emissions than carbon capture technology.

A new study from Stanford University has revealed that renewable energy solutions, such as wind and solar, are significantly more effective at reducing carbon emissions than carbon capture technology. Researchers argue that rather than relying on costly and inefficient carbon capture methods, governments and industries should prioritize expanding renewable infrastructure to achieve meaningful climate goals. The study highlights how carbon capture often consumes more energy than it saves, making it a less viable solution in the fight against climate change. Read more.
More in

Jul 14, 2025
India Achieves 50% Non‑Fossil Power Capacity Five Years Ahead of Target
India has reached 50% of its installed electricity capacity from non-fossil sources—solar, wind, hydro, and nuclear—marking a major milestone well ahead of its 2030 clean energy goal.

Jul 11, 2025
China Introduces First Renewable-Energy Targets for Steel, Cement, Polysilicon & Data Centres
China’s National Development and Reform Commission rolled out its first Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) for heavy industry—steel, cement, polysilicon—and new data centers, mandating significant renewable power use by province.